Login
Home > Blog

Senate Approves Requirement for Peer Review of Army Corps of Engineers Water Projects

21 Jul 2006 in , , ,

On July 19, the Senate approved by roll call vote of 56-43 an amendment to the Water Resources Development Act of 2005 that would require peer review of water projects undertaken by the Army Corps of Engineers.

The text of Senate Amendment No. 4681 is below, as reported in the Congressional Record

Neutral Source will return with an analysis of the text, comparing it and contrasting it with the peer review models that apply to federal regulation.


SEC. 2007. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:

    (1) CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.--The term ``construction activities'' means development of detailed engineering and design specifications during the preconstruction engineering and design phase and the engineering and design phase of a water resources project carried out by the Corps of Engineers, and other activities carried out on a water resources project prior to completion of the construction and to turning the project over to the local cost-share partner.

    (2) PROJECT STUDY.--The term ``project study'' means a feasibility report, reevaluation report, or environmental impact statement prepared by the Corps of Engineers.

    (b) Director of Independent Review.--The Secretary shall appoint in the Office of the Secretary a Director of Independent Review. The Director shall be selected from among individuals who are distinguished experts in engineering, hydrology, biology, economics, or another discipline related to water resources management. The Secretary shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the Director does not have a financial, professional, or other conflict of interest with projects subject to review. The Director of Independent Review shall carry out the duties set forth in this section and such other duties as the Secretary deems appropriate.

    (c) Sound Project Planning.--

    (1) PROJECTS SUBJECT TO PLANNING REVIEW.--The Secretary shall ensure that each project study for a water resources project shall be reviewed by an independent panel of experts established under this subsection if--

    (A) the project has an estimated total cost of more than $40,000,000, including mitigation costs;

    (B) the Governor of a State in which the water resources project is located in whole or in part, or the Governor of a State within the drainage basin in which a water resources project is located and that would be directly affected economically or environmentally as a result of the project, requests in writing to the Secretary the establishment of an independent panel of experts for the project;

    (C) the head of a Federal agency with authority to review the project determines that the project is likely to have a significant adverse impact on public safety, or on environmental, fish and wildlife, historical, cultural, or other resources under the jurisdiction of the agency, and requests in writing to the Secretary the establishment of an independent panel of experts for the project; or

    (D) the Secretary determines on his or her own initiative, or shall determine within 30 days of receipt of a written request for a controversy determination by any party, that the project is controversial because--

    (i) there is a significant dispute regarding the size, nature, potential safety risks, or effects of the project; or

    (ii) there is a significant dispute regarding the economic, or environmental costs or benefits of the project.

    (2) PROJECT PLANNING REVIEW PANELS.--

    (A) PROJECT PLANNING REVIEW PANEL MEMBERSHIP.--For each water resources project subject to review under this subsection, the Director of Independent Review shall establish a panel of independent experts that shall be composed of not less than 5 nor more than 9 independent experts (including at least 1 engineer, 1 hydrologist, 1 biologist, and 1 economist) who represent a range of areas of expertise. The Director of Independent Review shall apply the National Academy of Science's policy for selecting committee members to ensure that members have no conflict with the project being reviewed, and shall consult with the National Academy of Sciences in developing lists of individuals to serve on panels of experts under this subsection. An individual serving on a panel under this subsection shall be compensated at a rate of pay to be determined by the Secretary, and shall be allowed travel expenses.

    (B) DUTIES OF PROJECT PLANNING REVIEW PANELS.--An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall review the project study, receive from the public written and oral comments concerning the project study, and submit a written report to the Secretary that shall contain the panel's conclusions and recommendations regarding project study issues identified as significant by the panel, including issues such as--

    (i) economic and environmental assumptions and projections;

    (ii) project evaluation data;

    (iii) economic or environmental analyses;

    (iv) engineering analyses;

    (v) formulation of alternative plans;

    (vi) methods for integrating risk and uncertainty;

    (vii) models used in evaluation of economic or environmental impacts of proposed projects; and

    (viii) any related biological opinions.

    (C) PROJECT PLANNING REVIEW RECORD.--

    (i) IN GENERAL.--After receiving a report from an independent panel of experts established under this subsection, the Secretary shall take into consideration any recommendations contained in the report and shall immediately make the report available to the public on the internet.

    (ii) RECOMMENDATIONS.--The Secretary shall prepare a written explanation of any recommendations of the independent panel of experts established under this subsection not adopted by the Secretary. Recommendations and findings of the independent panel of experts rejected without good cause shown, as determined by judicial review, shall be given equal deference as the recommendations and findings of the Secretary during a judicial proceeding relating to the water resources project.

    (iii) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS AND PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.--The report of the independent panel of experts established under this subsection and the written explanation of the Secretary required by clause (ii) shall be included with the report of the Chief of Engineers to Congress, shall be published in the Federal Register, and shall be made available to the public on the Internet.

    (D) DEADLINES FOR PROJECT PLANNING REVIEWS.--

    (i) IN GENERAL.--Independent review of a project study shall be completed prior to the completion of any Chief of Engineers report for a specific water resources project.

[Page: S7815]

    (ii) DEADLINE FOR PROJECT PLANNING REVIEW PANEL STUDIES.--An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall complete its review of the project study and submit to the Secretary a report not later than 180 days after the date of establishment of the panel, or not later than 90 days after the close of the public comment period on a draft project study that includes a preferred alternative, whichever is later. The Secretary may extend these deadlines for good cause.

    (iii) FAILURE TO COMPLETE REVIEW AND REPORT.--If an independent panel of experts established under this subsection does not submit to the Secretary a report by the deadline established by clause (ii), the Chief of Engineers may continue project planning without delay.

    (iv) DURATION OF PANELS.--An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall terminate on the date of submission of the report by the panel. Panels may be established as early in the planning process as deemed appropriate by the Director of Independent Review, but shall be appointed no later than 90 days before the release for public comment of a draft study subject to review under subsection (c)(1)(A), and not later than 30 days after a determination that review is necessary under subsection (c)(1)(B), (c)(1)(C), or (c)(1)(D).

    (E) EFFECT ON EXISTING GUIDANCE.--The project planning review required by this subsection shall be deemed to satisfy any external review required by Engineering Circular 1105-2-408 (31 May 2005) on Peer Review of Decision Documents.

    (d) Safety Assurance.--

    (1) PROJECTS SUBJECT TO SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW.--The Secretary shall ensure that the construction activities for any flood damage reduction project shall be reviewed by an independent panel of experts established under this subsection if the Director of Independent Review makes a determination that an independent review is necessary to ensure public health, safety, and welfare on any project--

    (A) for which the reliability of performance under emergency conditions is critical;

    (B) that uses innovative materials or techniques;

    (C) for which the project design is lacking in redundancy, or that has a unique construction sequencing or a short or overlapping design construction schedule; or

    (D) other than a project described in subparagraphs (A) through (C), as the Director of Independent Review determines to be appropriate.

    (2) SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW PANELS.--At the appropriate point in the development of detailed engineering and design specifications for each water resources project subject to review under this subsection, the Director of Independent Review shall establish an independent panel of experts to review and report to the Secretary on the adequacy of construction activities for the project. An independent panel of experts under this subsection shall be composed of not less than 5 nor more than 9 independent experts selected from among individuals who are distinguished experts in engineering, hydrology, or other pertinent disciplines. The Director of Independent Review shall apply the National Academy of Science's policy for selecting committee members to ensure that panel members have no conflict with the project being reviewed. An individual serving on a panel of experts under this subsection shall be compensated at a rate of pay to be determined by the Secretary, and shall be allowed travel expenses.

    (3) DEADLINES FOR SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEWS.--An independent panel of experts established under this subsection shall submit a written report to the Secretary on the adequacy of the construction activities prior to the initiation of physical construction and periodically thereafter until construction activities are completed on a publicly available schedule determined by the Director of Independent Review for the purposes of assuring the public safety. The Director of Independent Review shall ensure that these reviews be carried out in a way to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, while not causing unnecessary delays in construction activities.

    (4) SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW RECORD.--After receiving a written report from an independent panel of experts established under this subsection, the Secretary shall--

    (A) take into consideration recommendations contained in the report, provide a written explanation of recommendations not adopted, and immediately make the report and explanation available to the public on the Internet; and

    (B) submit the report to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

    (e) Expenses.--

    (1) IN GENERAL.--The costs of an independent panel of experts established under subsection (c) or (d) shall be a Federal expense and shall not exceed--

    (A) $250,000, if the total cost of the project in current year dollars is less than $50,000,000; and

    (B) 0.5 percent of the total cost of the project in current year dollars, if the total cost is $50,000,000 or more.

    (2) WAIVER.--The Secretary, at the written request of the Director of Independent Review, may waive the cost limitations under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines appropriate.

    (f) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report describing the implementation of this section.

    (g) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any authority of the Secretary to cause or conduct a peer review of the engineering, scientific, or technical basis of any water resources project in existence on the date of enactment of this Act.

name

[add a comment]

Add a Comment

*
*
*
Check to receive notifications of future comments.
Yes
No