Federal "Good Agriculture Practice" Guidance:
What does the guidance say about the use of manure?

29 Sep 2006 in Regulatory Science, Regulatory Policy

It is said that federal "Good Agricultural Practice" guidance ensures that fresh produce does not transmit pathogenic foodborne illness. Is this a reasonable inference?

The federal government's Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) guidance offers advice with respect to the use of manure. The relevant text is reproduced below.

Basically, the guidance exhorts growers to be careful. Beyond that, it's not very illuminating. Here is what GAP says about animal manure:

• "Growers must also be alert to the presence of human or animal fecal matter that may be unwittingly introduced into the produce growing and handling environments."
• "A variety of treatments may be used to reduce pathogens in manure and other organic materials. Treatment may be performed by the grower using organic materials generated on the farm or by a supplier. Choice of treatment will depend on the needs and resources of an individual grower or supplier."
• "A variety of treatments may be used to reduce pathogens in manure and other organic materials. Treatment may be performed by the grower using organic materials generated on the farm or by a supplier. Choice of treatment will depend on the needs and resources of an individual grower or supplier."
• "Management practices required to achieve the time and temperature necessary to eliminate or reduce microbial hazards in manure or other organic materials may vary depending on seasonal and regional climatic factors."

The GAP's manure management suggestions seem equally unremarkable:

• "Manure storage and treatment sites should be situated as far as practicable from fresh produce production and handling areas."
• "Consider barriers or physical containment to secure manure storage or treatment areas where contamination from runoff, leaching, or wind spread is a concern."
• "Consider good agricultural practices to minimize leachate from manure storage or treatment areas contaminating produce."
• "Consider practices to minimize the potential of recontaminating treated manure."
• "Consider incorporating manure into the soil prior to planting."
• "Applying raw manure, or leachate from raw manure, to produce fields during the growing season prior to harvest is not recommended."
• "Maximize the time between application of manure to produce production areas and harvest."
• "Where it is not possible to maximize the time between application and harvest, such as for fresh produce crops which are harvested throughout most of the year, raw manure should not be used"

Elsewhere, the GAP says the federal government is largely ignorant about the pathogenic risks posed by manure:

• "Research on pathogen survival in untreated manure, treatments to reduce pathogen levels in manure, and assessing the risk of cross-contamination of food crops from manure under varying conditions is largely just beginning" (emphasis added).

"Good Agricultural Practice" Guidelines

• III. MANURE AND MUNICIPAL BIOSOLIDS Growers should follow good agricultural practices for handling animal manure or biosolids to minimize microbial hazards. Properly treated manure or biosolids can be an effective and safe fertilizer. Untreated, improperly treated, or recontaminated manure or biosolids used as a fertilizer, used to improve soil structure, or that enters surface or ground waters through runoff, may contain pathogens of public health significance that can contaminate produce. Crops in or near the soil are most vulnerable to pathogens which may survive in the soil. Low growing crops that may be splashed with soil during irrigation or heavy rainfall are also at risk if pathogens in manure persist in the soil. Produce where the edible portion of the crop generally does not contact soil is less at risk of contamination provided that produce that does contact the ground (e.g., windfalls) is not harvested. As with agricultural water, physical characteristics of produce that foster entrapment or attachment also affect risk. Growers using manure or biosolids need to follow good agricultural practices to minimize microbial hazards. Growers also need to examine their specific growing environment to identify obvious sources of fecal matter that could be a source of contamination. A. Microbial Hazard Animal manure and human fecal matter represent a significant source of human pathogens. A particularly dangerous pathogen, Escherichia coli O157:H7, is known to originate primarily from ruminants such as cattle, sheep and deer, which shed it through their feces. In addition, animal and human fecal matter are known to harbor Salmonella, Cryptosporidium, and other pathogens. Therefore, the use of biosolids and manures, including solid manure, manure slurries, and manure tea, must be closely managed to limit the potential for pathogen contamination. Growers must also be alert to the presence of human or animal fecal matter that may be unwittingly introduced into the produce growing and handling environments. Potential sources of contamination include use of untreated or improperly treated manure; nearby composting or manure storage areas, livestock, or poultry operations; nearby municipal wastewater or biosolids storage, treatment, or disposal areas; and high concentrations of wildlife in the growing and harvesting environment (such as nesting birds in a packing shed or heavy concentrations of migratory birds, bats, or deer in fields). (See also Sections IV and V regarding worker hygiene and sanitary facilities in produce growing and packing environments.) B. Control of Potential Hazards Good agricultural practices for the use of animal manure or biosolids include treatments to reduce pathogens and maximizing the time between application to oduction areas and harvest of the crops. 1.0 Municipal Biosolids On July 18, 1991, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a notice in the Federal Register outlining the U.S. policy statements on the beneficial use of biosolids on Federal land, including its use on food crops (56 FR 33186). Requirements for the use of biosolids are set out in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 503 (40 CFR part 503). Part 503 requires either elimination of pathogens or significant reduction of pathogens along with certain restrictions (such as minimum times between the application of biosolids and the harvest of different food or feed crops). Some states also have requirements for the use of biosolids. Growers using biosolids must first meet the requirements of Part 503 and then comply with any additional state requirements. Since animal manure may contain equal or higher levels of certain pathogens, some of which are infectious to humans, growers may want to consider some of the principles behind the Part 503 requirements and consider the appropriateness of adapting these practices to the land application of manure. (See Appendix for information on obtaining 40 CFR part 503.) The use of biosolids on fields used to produce food crops involves a number of concerns in addition to microbial risk factors (e.g., potentially toxic heavy metals and organic compounds) that are beyond the scope of this document (which focuses on microbial hazards). However, these concerns are addressed in the Part 503 regulation. Growers may obtain guidance on proper agronomic methods for the use of biosolids from USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (formerly the Soil Conservation Service), and Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES). For additional technical information on the use of biosolids or manure in crop production, including fruits and vegetables, growers may consult the resources at the end of this section. 2.0 Good Agricultural Practices for Manure Management Growers should follow good agricultural practices for handling animal manure to reduce the introduction of microbial hazards to produce. Such practices include processes, like composting, that are designed to reduce possible levels of pathogens in manure. Good agricultural practices may also include minimizing direct or indirect manure-to-produce contact, especially close to harvest. Examples of good agricultural practices for growers to consider are discussed below. 2.1 Treatments to Reduce Pathogen Levels A variety of treatments may be used to reduce pathogens in manure and other organic materials. Treatment may be performed by the grower using organic materials generated on the farm or by a supplier. Choice of treatment will depend on the needs and resources of an individual grower or supplier. Treatments may be divided into two groups, passive and active. 2.1.1 Passive treatments Passive treatments rely primarily on the passage of time, in conjunction with environmental factors, such as natural temperature and moisture fluctuations and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, to reduce pathogens. To minimize microbial hazards, growers relying on passive treatments should ensure manure is well aged and decomposed before applying to fields. Holding time for passive treatments will vary depending on regional and seasonal climatic factors and on the type and source of manure. Passive treatments such as aging should not be confused with actively managed treatments such as composting. 2.1.2 Active treatments Active treatments generally involve a greater level of intentional management and a greater input of resources compared with passive treatments. Active treatments include pasteurization, heat drying, anaerobic digestion, alkali stabilization, aerobic digestion, or combinations of these. Composting is an active treatment commonly used to reduce the microbial hazards of raw manure. It is a controlled and managed process in which organic materials are digested, aerobically or anaerobically, by microbial action. When composting is carefully controlled and managed, and the appropriate conditions are achieved, the high temperature generated can kill most pathogens in a number of days. Thus, the risk of microbial contamination from composted manure is reduced compared to untreated manure. Composting should not be confused with simpler passive treatments such as aging. In general, passive treatments, such as aging, will require a significantly longer period of time to reduce microbial hazards compared to active treatments which expose pathogens to lethal conditions, such as high temperature or high pH. In addition, much of the research on the composting of manure and application of manure to field crops has focused on the effects of different practices on soil fertility and crop quality. Research on pathogen survival in untreated manure, treatments to reduce pathogen levels in manure, and assessing the risk of cross-contamination of food crops from manure under varying conditions is largely just beginning. Some pathogens tolerate higher temperatures than others. In addition, management practices required to achieve the time and temperature necessary to eliminate or reduce microbial hazards in manure or other organic materials may vary depending on seasonal and regional climatic factors (such as ambient temperature and rainfall) and on the specific management practices of an individual operation. While the agencies do not have sufficient data to make specific time and temperature recommendations that would apply to all composting or other manure treatment operations, good agricultural practices, as discussed below, may reduce the risk of microbial contamination of fresh produce by manure. 2.2 Handling and Application Review existing practices and conditions to identify potential sources of contamination. Manure storage and treatment sites should be situated as far as practicable from fresh produce production and handling areas. Minimize contamination of produce from manure in open fields, compost piles, or storage areas. Manure storage or treatment sites close to fresh produce fields or packinghouses increase the risk of microbial contamination. Thus, manure storage and treatments sites should be situated as far as practicable from fresh produce production and handling areas. The minimum distance necessary will depend on many factors, including farm layout and the slope of the land, what runoff controls are in place, the likelihood of wind-spread or heavy rainfall, and the quantity of manure and how it is contained. Consider barriers or physical containment to secure manure storage or treatment areas where contamination from runoff, leaching, or wind spread is a concern. Physical containment may include concrete block, soil berms, pits, or lagoons. Practices such as storage on concrete slabs or in clay lined lagoons may reduce the potential of leachate entering groundwater. Consider good agricultural practices to minimize leachate from manure storage or treatment areas contaminating produce. Rainfall onto a manure pile can result in leachate, potentially containing pathogens. Growers may want to consider covering manure piles, such as storing manure under a roof or covering piles with an appropriate covering. Alternatively, growers may consider collecting water that leaches through manure that is being stored or treated. Collecting leachate allows the grower to control its disposal (e.g., on a vegetative grassway) or use (e.g., to control moisture during composting). Leachate may pose a microbial hazard similar to the manure from which it originates. Growers using manure leachate or manure tea in fresh produce production areas should follow good agricultural practices, such as maximizing time between application and harvest, to minimize microbial hazards. Consider practices to minimize the potential of recontaminating treated manure. -Treated manure can be recontaminated by birds and rodents. Covered storage and reducing nearby harborage, like tall grass and debris, may reduce the potential for recontamination. -Equipment, such as tractors, that come into contact with untreated or partially treated manure and are then used in produce fields can be a source of contamination. Equipment used to turn compost, and other multiple use equipment that contacts manure, should be cleaned (such as with high pressure water or steam sprays) before it contacts fresh produce. Growers should also be aware of other factors, such as farm layout and traffic flow, that may allow a tractor to drive through manure before entering a produce field. 2.2.1 Untreated Manure Use of untreated (raw) manure on food crops carries a greater risk of contamination compared with the use of manure that has been treated to reduce pathogens. Growers using untreated manure may need to consider the following good agricultural practices: Consider incorporating manure into the soil prior to planting. Competition with soil microorganisms may reduce pathogens. Incorporating manure into the soil (e.g., prior to planting) may reduce microbial hazards. Applying raw manure, or leachate from raw manure, to produce fields during the growing season prior to harvest is not recommended. Maximize the time between application of manure to produce production areas and harvest. - In general, the shorter the time between application of raw manure to a production area and harvest of the crop, the greater the risk of pathogens being present in manure or soil and contaminating the crop. Although no one knows for sure how long pathogens can survive in the field or on produce, some researchers have reported that, depending on conditions, pathogens may survive in raw manure for as much as a year or longer (Ref. 11 and 12). Growers should maximize, to the greatest extent possible, the time between application of manure to produce production areas and harvest. - Good agricultural practices to maximize the time between manure application and harvest of produce for the fresh market include, but are not limited to, post-harvest application and incorporation, applying raw manure to a fall cover crop to minimize nutrient loss, planning crop rotations where manure is applied to agronomic crops, or to fields planted with crops that are to be cooked or properly heat-processed prior to being delivered to consumers. - Additional research is needed to determine how pathogens in manure may spread in the field. However, for some operations, drift, flooding, or runoff from adjacent fields may result in microbial hazards. Growers may consider scheduling application of raw manure on adjacent fields to maximize the time between manure application to those fields and harvest of fresh market produce. Growers may also consider establishing field plans where the fields closest to fresh produce crops are planted with crops that do not receive raw manure. Where it is not possible to maximize the time between application and harvest, such as for fresh produce crops which are harvested throughout most of the year, raw manure should not be used. 2.2.2 Treated Manure Natural fertilizers, such as composted manure, and fertilizers containing natural components, should be processed and handled in a manner to reduce the likelihood of introducing pathogens into produce production areas. Composting, appropriate aging, and other treatments may reduce but might not eliminate pathogens in manure. Furthermore, it is unknown to what extent pathogens that survive treatment may regrow in treated manure that is stored before use. Therefore, growers using treated manure may want to consider some of the recommendations made for untreated manure, such as maximizing time between application and harvest. Additional good agricultural practices for handling and application of treated manure follow. Avoid contamination of fresh produce from manure that is in the process of being composted or otherwise treated. Apply good agricultural practices that ensure that all materials receive an adequate treatment. - The specific requirements of any treatment to reduce pathogens depend on many factors, including types of organic materials being treated, pH, moisture content, process management, the carbon/nitrogen balance of the organic materials, and even climatic factors such as rainfall and temperature. - Whatever parameters are selected, growers and manure suppliers should apply good agricultural practices that ensure that all materials receive an adequate treatment, such as thorough mixing and turning outside edges into the center of a compost pile. Cold spots or other pockets that do not receive an adequate treatment can recontaminate the rest of the batch. Growers purchasing manure should obtain a specification sheet from the manure supplier for each shipment of manure containing information about the method of treatment. Growers should contact state or local manure handling experts for advice specific to their individual operations and regions. Assistance may be available through agricultural colleges or cooperative extension services. 3.0 Animal Feces Animal feces [sic] is a known source of pathogens that can cause foodborne illness. While it is not possible to completely exclude all animal life from all fresh produce production areas, many field programs include elements to protect crops from animal damage. Growers should review existing practices and conditions to assess the prevalence and likelihood of significant amounts of uncontrolled deposits of animal feces coming into contact with crops. Good agricultural practices for minimizing hazards from livestock include: Domestic animals should be excluded from fresh produce fields, vineyards, and orchards during the growing season. Depending on the operation, good management practices may include keeping livestock confined (e.g., in pens or yards) or preventing their entry into fields by using physical barriers such as fences. Where necessary, growers should consider measures to ensure that animal waste from adjacent fields or waste storage facilities does not contaminate the produce production areas. Growers should determine whether surrounding fields and farms are used for animal production. Growers may need to consider measures to ensure that animal waste from adjacent fields or waste storage facilities does not contaminate the produce production areas during heavy rains, especially if fresh produce is grown in low-lying fields or orchards. Measures might include physical barriers, such as ditches, mounds, grass/sod waterways, diversion berms, and vegetative buffer areas. In addition, high concentrations of wildlife (such as deer or waterfowl in a field) may increase the potential for microbial contamination. Control of wild animal populations in the field may be difficult, especially where crop production areas are adjacent to wooded areas, open meadows, and waterways. Federal, state, or local animal protection requirements must also be considered. However, to the extent possible, where high concentrations of wildlife are a concern, growers should consider establishing good agricultural practices to deter or redirect wildlife to areas with crops that are not destined for the fresh produce market. Helpful Resources: The NRCS Conservation Practice Standard 317, "Composting Facility" sets out standards for on-farm composting (USDA, SCS, December 1990) (202) 720-5157; http://www.ncg.nrcs.usda.gov/nhcp_2.html. NRCS AWMFH 651.1004(F), Rynk et al., "On Farm Composting Handbook," NRAES-54 Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, Cooperative Extension, 152 Riley-Robb Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-5701 (607) 255-7654. R.T. Haug, 1993, "The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering," Tachnomics Publishing Co., Inc, Lancaster, PA. "Domestic Septage Regulatory Guidance - A Guide to the EPA 503 Rule," EPA 832-B-92-005, September, 1993. US EPA, "A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule," EPA 1832-R-93-003, Washington DC, 1994. Environmental Regulation and Technology Control of Pathogens and Vector Attraction Reduction, EPA 1625/1-92/013, December 1992.

[add a comment]

Add a Comment